Fluoridation is mass medication, NZ Supreme Court rules

The State and Federal Governments forcing this chronic poisoning on the population is allegedly criminal !
Fluoridation Chemicals
http://sapphireeyesproductions.blogspot.com.au

—
HEALTH EFFECTS DATA BASE – FLUORIDE ACTION NETWORK
http://fluoridealert.org/researchers/health_database/

Drinking, eating & bathing in hazardous waste aka water fluoridation
Drinking, eating & bathing in hazardous waste aka water fluoridation
Hydrofluoric Acid – Acutely toxic chemical
https://www-esh.fnal.gov/CourseHandout_Mat/HF_MSDS.pdf

Diane Drayton Buckland
Fluoride Information Australia UNPAID fluorideinformationaustralia.wordpress.com

Some information violence and criminality – neurotoxicity and water fluoridation chemicals https://fluorideinformationaustralia.wordpress.com/violencecriminality/news-media-reports-research/

NO JAB NO PAY NO PLAY POLICY – GUNPOINT MEDICINE
http://www.opensourcetruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/STOP-TURNBULL-MORRISON-ABBOTT_S-THE-GREEN_S-LABOR-NATIONALS-NO-JAB-NO-PAY-NO-PLAY-POLICY-GUNPOINT-MEDICINE-FORCED-VACCINATION-copy-1-1.pdf

Real News Australia

Water fluoridation is compulsory mass medication, in breach of human rights, the Supreme Court has ruled by a majority vote. It confirmed that fluoridation is a medical treatment as claimed by opponents for over 60 years. It is not a supplement “just topping up natural levels”, as claimed by the Ministry of Health.

The impracticality of avoiding fluoridated water makes it compulsory in practice, the majority also ruled.

Three judges held that there was conflicting scientific evidence, confirming that the science is NOT settled.

Chief Justice Sian Elias then held that fluoridation was not prescribed by law (i.e. is unlawful), applying section 6 of the Bill of Rights Act. That was the correct decision in Fluoride Free NZ’s view.

The rest of the majority held that it was prescribed by law, and it was then necessary to apply a balancing test to determine if the breach of the right –…

View original post 1,122 more words

Advertisements

Smart meter radiation and health – why are we neglecting non-toxic alternatives?

Source: Smart meter radiation and health – why are we neglecting non-toxic alternatives?

GSK’s, MurderousWays!

The Vaccine Industry must be ‘roped in’ – danger, danger, danger.

Daily Grizzle "N" Grunt

http://www.whale.to/m/glaxo.html

Glaxo SmithKline
(Glaxo Wellcome & SmithKline Beecham) history
Corporations

[Satanic is the only word that does justice to this outfit (see Lucifer symbol over Wellcome building, below), one example:  After their Trivirex MMR vaccine was withdrawn as dangerous in Canada, in 1988, they managed to get it on the UK market with a government indemnity, under another name: Pluserix (seeMMR timeline).   When that had to be withdrawn they then sold it to the third world (causing an outbreak of meningitis in Brazil), while they have done their best to suppress the fact it caused autism and bowel disease, along with the present MMR vaccines. Sir Nigel Davis, who dismissed the appeal over the removal of fundingfor the MMR litigation by the Legal Services Commission, was the brother of Lancet proprietor Crispin Davis who at the time had also recently become a non-executive director of…

View original post 2,813 more words

Slott’s continued shilling for the AFS

Steven D. Slott, DDS, is ‘Information Director’ (LOL!) for the American Fluoridation Society, a notorious pro-fluoridation extremist group. His latest attempt to discredit anti-fluoridation arguments and concerns – via a letter in the Portland Press Herald – parrots the usual garbage. Let’s have a closer look at Slott’s letter:

Slott: “This is a health care issue, not one of water treatment.”

Well Mr. Slott, if that is so, then apply the principle of informed consent to treatment. You can’t ethically force people to be exposed to a treatment who may not want that treatment. Surely they taught you this in dental school? Slott is correct, however, that fluoridation is not a water treatment measure – it is most definitely a systemic human treatment and is not put in place to treat water in the normal sense.

“Fluoride is the only chemical added to water for the purpose of medical…

View original post 496 more words

Sue Ieraci: You are entitled to your own opinion, but you are not entitled to your own facts

Septic Skeptics

by Pedro Tierney

Just when I thought that the paid trolls working with the hate group, Stop the AVN, couldn’t possibly get any more ignorant, along comes Sue Ieraci.

This is Skeptic Dr Sue Ieraci

For those of you who are not aware of her, Sue Ieraci works in the Emergency Medicine Department at Bankstown Hospital in NSW.  She has written many opinion pieces for the Medical Journal of Australia and lists her specialties as:

Problem-solving, teaching and training, cognitive skills within health, change negotiation, clinical culture, liaison between government and clinicians, communication between clinicians and health system planners and architects.

Sounds pretty impressive, right?

How can a busy Emergency Doctor respond to social media comments within a moments notice any time of the day or night ?

Why then, is Sue able to respond to tweets and other social media comments within moments of them being posted at nearly…

View original post 711 more words

CDC Scientists “Directed to Do Things We Know Aren’t Right”

And the Band Plays On

On Monday, The Hill newspaper published a story claiming that “The CDC is being influenced by corporate and political interests,” as alleged by over a dozen senior scientists at CDC who collectively call themselves CDC SPIDER – Scientists Preserving Integrity, Diligence, and Ethics in Research. The group has chosen to remain anonymous “for fear of retribution.”

On August 29, the CDC SPIDER filed a complaint letter with CDC Chief of Staff Carmen S. Villar that makes a number of strong and unambiguous allegations that would shock most Americans, who trust the public health agency charged with “developing and applying disease prevention and control, environmental health, and health promotion and health education activities designed to improve the health of the people of the United States.” In their complaint, the SPIDER group states “It is puzzling to read about [CDC] transgressions in national media outlets like USA Today, The Huffington…

View original post 2,292 more words

Do I have to provide my name on my Census form?

Castan Centre for Human Rights Law

Guest post by Dr Caroline Henckels

Last week one of my Public Law students asked me whether it was true that the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) could demand a person’s name on the Census form. The issue has been all over social media in recent days.

Collecting names on Census night isn’t new – but people are concerned that the ABS will now be retaining peoples’ names, whereas previously it destroyed identifying information before analysing the data. Retaining identifying information that can be linked to Census records has potentially significant privacy implications. Although the data provided to the ABS is protected by robust secrecy provisions in the Census and Statistics Act 1905 (the Act), questions have been asked about the security of the storage of data and the potential for its misuse.

It’s difficult to call into question the value of the Census – it provides essential information for…

View original post 1,106 more words